论文部分内容阅读
外观主义法理源自日耳曼法,后经德国学者继承发展而得以体系化,并成为德国法的精髓。外观主义法理广泛地渗透于现代私法体系中,以致有人称之为“外观万能”。①它“在民商法领域都存在,但在商法领域表现更为明显。”“由于商法的价值与民法的价值重心不同,外观法理在民法上是一项辅助性原则,例如,在物权无因性、权利登记、表见代理、善意取得等领域始有贯彻,其深广度远不如商法领域。但在商法领域,外观优越法理优先适用并作为商法的基本价值,始终贯穿于商法总则及分则之中。”②“法律思维,大体上是指法律人根据现行有效法规范进行思考、判断和解决法律问题的一种思维定势,一种法律意识、法律思想和法律文化所影响的认识与实践的理性认识过程。”③依此类推,商事裁判思维则是按照商法规范处理商事纠纷案件,并作出判决的思维方式。商法规范蕴含、贯穿着外观主义的理念,这必然使商事裁判的出发点、相关要素的考量、规范解释方式的选择、漏洞补充和价值评判等,有别于根据民法规范进行裁判的思维方式,从而决定着商事裁判
Dermatism jurisprudence originated from the Germanic law, after the succession of German scholars to be systematic and become the essence of German law. The law of exteriorism permeates the modern private law system extensively, so that some people call it “the appearance of universalism.” It exists both in civil and commercial law, but more so in commercial law. “” Since the value of commercial law is different from that of civil law, appearance law is an auxiliary principle in civil law. For example, Property rights without reason, the right to register, the appearance of agents, goodwill and other areas have been implemented, its breadth is far less than the area of commercial law .But in the field of commercial law, superior appearance jurisprudence priority and as the basic value of commercial law, and always throughout the commercial law General principles and sub-rules. “” ② “” Legal thinking generally refers to a mindset of legal persons thinking, judging and resolving legal problems according to the existing law of valid law, a legal consciousness, legal thought and law Cultural understanding of the understanding and practice of the process of rational understanding. “” ③ and so on, thinking of commercial referees is in accordance with commercial law norms dealing with commercial disputes, and make judgments way of thinking. The norms of commercial law imply and permeate the concept of appearanceism, which necessarily distinguishes the starting point of commercial judgment, the consideration of relevant factors, the choice of normative interpretation, the supplement of loopholes and the value judgments, which are different from the way of thinking of refereeing according to the norms of civil law. Decided to commercial judgment