论文部分内容阅读
本文总结解放军总医院、北京军区总医院、沈阳军区202医院、海军总医院、济南军区89医院、309医院、成都军区总医院及220医院八个单位628例头位初产妇试用CF81—1型综合产椅坐式分娩并以同样情况卧式分娩628例进行对照观察,其结果如下。第二产程时间比较见下表。表中可见第二产程时间坐式较卧式分娩明显缩短。本组坐式分娩会阴裂伤80例,卧式分娩会阴裂伤128例;坐式分娩产后平均出血量129.63ml,卧式分娩产后平均出血量156.12ml;坐式分娩发生新生儿窒息48例,卧式分娩发生新生儿窒息61例。
This article summarizes 628 cases of the first trimester CFP-1 CFD-1 trial of PLA General Hospital, Beijing Military Region General Hospital, Shenyang Military Region 202 Hospital, Navy General Hospital, Jinan Military Region 89 Hospital, 309 Hospital, Chengdu Military Region General Hospital and 220 Hospital Production chair sitting delivery and the same situation of horizontal delivery 628 cases of controlled observation, the results are as follows. The second stage of labor more time table below. The table shows that the second stage of labor than sitting horizontal delivery was significantly shorter. In this group, 80 cases of sitting perineal laceration and 128 cases of perineal laceration of horizontal delivery were born. The mean postpartum hemorrhage volume was 129.63ml in sitting delivery and 156.12ml in horizontal delivery. The 48 cases of neonatal asphyxia in sitting delivery, 61 cases of neonatal asphyxia in horizontal delivery.