“安顺地戏案”并非常规案件,法官需要通过价值判断才能选择可以适用的具体规范。对于这类案件,固守法条主义的裁判思维,容易得出武断的结论,出现法律效果和社会效果的矛盾。本文在皮尔斯“实效主义”哲学的基础上,提出“实效主义裁判思维”的概念,并结合个案,论证了这种思维方式对于处理类似案件的合理性。为认识司法裁判的开放与封闭、合法与合情等法理问题提供了新的视角。 “Anshun scene ” is not a regular case, the judge needs to judge by value to select the specific norms that can be applied. For such cases, sticking to the rule of law and judgments, it is easy to come to an arbitrary conclusion, showing the contradiction between legal effects and social effects. On the basis of Pierce ’s theory of “pragmatism ”, this paper puts forward the concept of “pragmatism ’ s judgment ”. Combining with individual cases, this article demonstrates the rationality of this mode of thinking in dealing with similar cases. It provides a new perspective for understanding the legal issues such as the opening and closure of judicial adjudication, lawfulness and coexistence.