论文部分内容阅读
Background: The clinical relevance of the circulating soluble form of the Fas-Receptor (sFas) was investigated in patients with hepatitis C receiving type 1 interferon (IFN) therapy. Methods: sFas was quantified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in 66 hepatitis C virus (HCV) carriers and 30 HCV-naive or previously infected controls. The levels were then monitored during enhanced treatment with type 1 IFNs in 15 chronic hepatitis C patients. Results: The HCV carriers had high levels of sFas compared with controls (3.8 ±1.3 vs 2.7 ±0.8ng/ml; P < 0.001). sFas levels in patients with chronic HCV infection were directly related to serum alanine aminotransferase levels (r = 0.440; P < 0.001) and the histological grade (r = 0.403; P = 0.019). Among necroinflammatory reactions, only piecemeal necrosis showed a correlation with sFas levels (r = 0.556; P = 0.001). Pretreatment sFas levels, however, were not predictive of therapeutic outcomes. A sustained virological response to enhanced IFN therapy showed a relation to only the pretreatment HCV load. Interestingly, circulating sFas was upregulated when IFN-βwas administered at short intervals (3MU/every 12h). This upregulation was accompanied by parallel aminotransferase elevation, which was observed regardless of a virological response. Conclusions: sFas elevation, in parallel with the severity of liver injury, suggests the possible upregulation of hepatic Fas expression and the Fas-mediated pathway in both HCV-and type 1 IFN-induced liver injury. The essential function of sFas to protect hepatocytes against Fas-mediated liver injury was not evident in these clinical settings.
Background: The clinical relevance of the circulating soluble form of the Fas-Receptor (sFas) was investigated in patients with hepatitis C receiving type 1 interferon (IFN) therapy. Methods: sFas was quantified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in 66 hepatitis C virus (HCV) carriers and 30 HCV-naive or previously infected controls. The levels were then monitored during enhanced treatment with type 1 IFNs in 15 chronic hepatitis C patients. Results: The HCV carriers had high levels of sFas compared with controls (3.8 ± 1.3 vs 2.7 ± 0.8 ng / ml; P <0.001). sFas levels in patients with chronic HCV infection were directly related to serum alanine aminotransferase levels (r = 0.440; P <0.001) and the histological grade Among necroinflammatory reactions, only piecemeal necrosis showed a correlation with sFas levels (r = 0.556; P = 0.001). Pretreatment sFas levels, however, were not predictive of therapeutic outcomes. A sustained virological response to enhanced IFN therapy showed a relation to only the pretreatment HCV load. Interestingly, circulating sFas was upregulated when IFN-β was administered at short intervals (3MU / every 12h). This upregulation was accompanied by parallel aminotransferase elevation, which was observed regardless of a virological response. Conclusions: sFas elevation, in parallel with the severity of liver injury, suggests the possible upregulation of hepatic Fas expression and the Fas-mediated pathway in both HCV-and type 1 IFN-induced liver injury. The essential function of sFas to protect hepatocytes against Fas-mediated liver injury was not evident in these clinical settings.