论文部分内容阅读
锡山市志办杨锡根在《江苏地方志》1999年第3期撰文《续志工作中要解决的三个问题》,认为地方志书的著作权应属于方志办,而不是地方志编委会.理由是:一、地方志编委会不是一个常设的工作机构,其委员均为各主要部门的负责人,一年中最多有二三次编委会全体成员会议,商讨修志工作中的一些重大问题,具体的修志业务是由方志办承担的,从总体设计、资料征集到编辑定稿,是由方志办的工作人员完成的.因而,方志办才是志书的真正编纂者,是编纂的主体,才享有著作权.二、地方志编委会不是必
Xishan City, Zhi-Yang Yang in the << Jiangsu Local History >> 1999 the third author of << Continued work to be resolved in the three issues >> think local copyright should belong to the local Zhi Zhi Ban, rather than local history editorial board. , Local history editorial board is not a permanent working organization, its members are responsible for the major departments, a year up to two or three times all members of the editorial board meeting to discuss some important issues in the work of rewriting, the specific revision The business is carried out by the Fangzhi Office, from the overall design, information collection to finalize the editorial, is done by the staff of the Fangzhi .Therefore, Fangzhi Zhi is the real compilers, is the main body of the compilation, only to enjoy copyright. Second, local history editorial board is not necessary