允许人才流动是保证落实知识分子政策的一个重要问题。近来读报,忽然感到人们对这个问题的看法,似乎还不太一致。比如,我有一位朋友,是在大学任教的中年教师,最迎接受了另一所大学的聘请,希望从这个学校“流动”到那个学校。当他把这个想法向领导提出来时,便遭到了坚决的拒绝。理由很简单,就是:你已经对口了,不属于人才流动的对象。“专业对口”了,是否就不能进行人才流动? 诚然,允许人才流动,首先是针对那种用非所学,学用不一致,对知识分子使用不当的现象。不改变这种现象,就不能很好地调动知识分子的积极性,就会埋没人才。然而,做到了“专业对口”,并不等于就已经调动了知识分子的积极性。全面落实知识分子政策还需要做很多的工 Allowing the flow of talent is an important issue for ensuring the implementation of the policy of intellectuals. Recently reading newspapers, I suddenly felt that people’s views on this issue, it seems not quite the same. For example, I have a friend who is a middle-aged teacher who teaches at a university. He is hired by another university to “flow” to the school from this school. When he put this idea to the leader, he was strongly rejected. The reason is very simple, that is: you have been the counterpart, not the subject of the flow of talent. “Professional counterparts,” and whether the flow of talent can not be carried out? Admittedly, allowing for the flow of talent is, above all, the phenomenon of using intellectuals inappropriately or not with different kinds of learning. If we do not change this phenomenon, we will not be able to arouse the enthusiasm of the intellectuals well and we will have buried the talents. However, to achieve “professional counterparts” does not mean that they have already mobilized the enthusiasm of intellectuals. The full implementation of the policy of intellectuals also needs to be done a lot of work