通过比较《生死疲劳》和《蛙》可以发现,作者莫言虽然借助再造或再现历史来展现故事,但并不着意于对历史的批判。两部小说风格上的迥异某种程度上对应于作者针对现实的态度上的截然相反。对于这种不同,既与小说的文体特征和形式探索有关,也与作者面向西方世界的潜在态度密不可分。虽然,在这两部小说中作者表现出融合中西的努力,但另一方面,这种融合却是以向西方的靠拢而底完成,因而某种程度上,这一靠拢就成为等待救赎的表征,其能获得诺贝尔文学奖,也就是情理之中的事情了。 By comparing “Fatigue” and “Frog” can be found, although the author Mo Yan relics or reproduce history to show the story, but not intended to criticize history. The differences in style between the two novels correspond to the exact opposite of the author’s attitude toward the reality. This difference not only relates to the stylistic features and exploration of the novel, but also to the writer’s potential attitude towards the Western world. Although the authors in these two novels demonstrated their efforts to integrate China and the West, on the other hand, this integration was accomplished by moving closer to the West and, to some extent, this convergence became the symbol of waiting for redemption , Which can get the Nobel Prize for Literature, which is the reason of things.