论文部分内容阅读
近年来,网络购物标价错误该如何处理一直是台湾法学界热议的话题。就实务判决而言,台湾法院仍回归传统民法之规定,透过要约、承诺、意思表示错误撤销规则以及诚信原则的适用来妥善处理个案。而对比祖国大陆之相关立法,虽两岸在以上具体规则的设计上有所差异,但实际之法效大致相同。唯在网购合同中,为加强对消费者利益的保护,台湾通过特别法对传统契约法的某些规则做了一定程度的修正,可资祖国大陆借鉴。
In recent years, how to deal with the wrong price of online shopping has always been a topic of discussion in Taiwan law circles. As far as substantive judgments are concerned, Taiwan's courts are still returning to the provisions of the traditional civil law and properly handle cases through the application of the rules of offer, promise and meaning to represent the wrongful revocation and the principle of good faith. While comparing the relevant legislation on the mainland, although the differences between the two sides in the design of the above specific rules are different, the actual legal provisions are generally the same. Only in online shopping contracts, in order to strengthen the protection of consumers' interests, Taiwan has amended certain rules of the traditional contract law through special laws, which can be borrowed by the motherland.