论文部分内容阅读
在三人仲裁庭进行仲裁程序的过程中,有时会出现一名仲裁员缺席,而剩下两名仲裁员则径直作出裁决的情形,这种裁决就是缺员仲裁裁决。由于《纽约公约》对该问题的相关规定较为模糊,加上各国国内立法、司法机关以及仲裁机构对于缺员仲裁的态度也存在差异,因此在承认与执行阶段,缺员仲裁裁决的效力认定方面存在风险。本文结合了《纽约公约》的相关规定,并基于缺员仲裁的特定情况,详细分析了缺员仲裁裁决效力认定时可能遭遇的风险,并提出了解决的建议。
In the arbitration proceedings of the three-person tribunal, one arbitrator was absent from time to time and the remaining two arbitrators went straight to the verdict, which was a layman’s decision. Due to the obscure provisions of the New York Convention on this issue and the differences in the attitude of national legislatures, judicial organs and arbitration institutions regarding the absence of arbitration, so in the recognition and implementation stage, the validity of the absence of arbitration award There is a risk. Based on the relevant provisions of the New York Convention and based on the specific circumstances of the absence of arbitration, this article analyzes in detail the risks that may be encountered in determining the validity of the absence of arbitration awards and proposes solutions to the problems.