论文部分内容阅读
随着高速公路联网收费的不断推进,多路径识别问题在部分省市,特别是投资主体多元化、复杂化的省市越来越突出。而围绕要不要进行路径识别,怎样进行精确的路径识别,为了精确拆分占总通行费比例仅为1％的,具有争议的通行费,花费不菲的代价进行精确路径识别,到底值不值等问题,业界一方面在深入探讨,另一方面部分省市已开始动作,从方案比选到设备选型,再到具体实施,可以说,路径识别在人们的争论中就悄然上路了,但走得不踏实,走得很迷惑。比如,已经尝试性建设路径识别系统的省市,必将背上这样一个包袱,即现在已建成的系统很可能面临滞后颁布的ETC国标的严峻挑战!此外,用现有的技术和设备解决路径识别问题似乎还难以满足需要,还不是最佳的解决方案。路径识别,已成为一个受人关注却又不知何去何从的话题。“路径识别”的路需要有人识别!为此,记者采访了业内有关专家,试图通过调查,研读业内人士的专题文章,探讨路径识别的现状、问题和未来。
With the continuous promotion of highway network charging, multi-path identification problems are becoming more and more prominent in some provinces and cities, especially the diversified and complicated investment subjects. And around whether or not to identify the path, how to accurately identify the path, in order to accurately split the total toll accounted for only 1% of the proportion of the controversial tolls, expensive costly path identification accuracy, in the end worth On the other hand, some provinces and cities have begun to move from the selection of projects to the selection of equipment and then to the specific implementation. It can be said that path identification has quietly taken the road in people’s debate. However, Go not practical, go very confused. For example, provinces and municipalities that have already tried to build a path identification system will inevitably bear the burden that the systems now being built are likely to face the harsh challenge of lagging behind the ETC national standard. In addition, using existing technologies and equipment to solve the problem Recognizing the problem seems difficult to meet the needs, is not the best solution. Path recognition has become a subject of concern but do not know where to go. Therefore, the reporter interviewed relevant experts in the industry and tried to investigate the status quo, problems and future of path recognition by investigating and reading the feature articles of the insiders.