一、引言——问题的提出中南财经政法大学知识产权研究中心于2013年完成了《知识产权侵权损害赔偿案例实证研究报告》。该报告以2008年6月我国知识产权战略开始实施以来全国各级法院审理的4768件知识产权侵权有效司法判例为统计对象。根据该报告显示,在著作权侵权案件的判赔中,采用“法定赔偿”判赔标准的占78.54%;在商标权侵权案件的判赔中,采用上述标准的占97.63%。在专利权侵权案件的判赔中,2采用上述标准的占97.25%。1而根据广州两级法院的统计结果 I. INTRODUCTION - PROBLEM PROBLEM The Center for Intellectual Property Research of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law completed the Empirical Study on Cases of Compensation for Infringement of Intellectual Property Rights in 2013. The report takes 4,768 valid judicial precedents on IPR infringement as the statistical objects in the courts of all levels across the country since the implementation of our IP strategy in June 2008. According to the report, in the case of copyright infringement, 78.54% of them use the “statutory compensation” award standard, and 97.63% of the above-mentioned standards are used in the judgment of trademark infringement cases. In the case of patent infringement claims, 2 using the above criteria accounted for 97.25%. 1 According to the statistics of Guangzhou two levels of courts