论文部分内容阅读
本文认为，修辞（尤其是深层修辞）是一种艺术创造活动。因此，按照艺术的和审美的规律，去探寻语言的艺术性、语言艺术化的运思过程和艺术创造的各种手段，揭示艺术语言负载信息的特点，就不仅是艺术语言学的任务，而且也是修辞学的职能之一。骆小所先生在《云南师范大学哲学社会科学学报》１９９４年第２期发表的《修辞学的性质新论》中关于“修辞学属于艺术部门而不属于科学部门”的阐述，也正是在这个意义上对修辞学的性质所作的科学界定，而郑荣馨同志对此所持的否定态度，其实质则在于未能理解艺术语言中“艺术”的含义以及“艺术”与“科学”的界限，他提出“质疑”的其中几点，前提并不存在。
This article argues that rhetoric (especially deep rhetoric) is an art creation activity. Therefore, it is not only the task of art linguistics, but also the rhetoric to explore the artistic style of language, the process of thinking of language art, the means of artistic creation, and revealing the characteristics of art language load information according to the artistic and aesthetic rules One of the functions of learning. Mr. Luo Xiaosuo in the “Philosophy of Social Sciences, Yunnan Normal University,” No. 2, 1994, published a “new theory of the nature of rhetoric” about “rhetoric belongs to the art department but not to the scientific department,” the exposition, it is In this sense, the nature of rhetoric made a scientific definition, and Comrade Zheng Rongxin’s negative attitude toward it is based on the failure to understand the meaning of “art” in art language and the boundary between “art” and “science”. He Some of the points raised in “questioning” do not exist.