论文部分内容阅读
面对春秋战国时期整个社会的失衡,儒、法两家的思想家们基于各自对历史、现实和人生价值等方面的考察与认识,提出了各具特色的社会管理观。儒家企图通过以德去刑的途径来实现“和为贵”的理想蓝图。法家则欲通过以刑去德的方式来达到天下太平。尽管两家在社会管理的途径上迥然相异,在“德”与“刑”上争执不下,但两者都是站在维护专制王权的根本立场上,都是围绕“如何处理个人利益追求与维护社会整体和谐的关系”这一中心的。从理论上,两家社会管理理论互有短长,只有把二者有机结合起来,才能真正地有效地实行社会控制。但是,从历史上考察,法家社会管理学说却远不如儒家学说那样受到社会统治者的青睐。
Faced with the social imbalance in the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period, thinkers from Confucianism and France put forward distinctive views on social management based on their own investigation and understanding of history, reality and the value of life. Confucianism attempted to achieve the ideal blueprint of “peace is preciousness” through the means of detention in Germany. Legalists want to reach the world peace by way of punishments. Although the two are quite different in the ways of social management, they can not compete on the basis of “morality” and “punishment.” However, both are standing on the fundamental standpoint of safeguarding autocratic monarchy and all around “how The pursuit of personal interests and the maintenance of social harmony as a whole ”this center. Theoretically, the two theories of social management are short and long, and only by organically combining the two can we truly and effectively exercise social control. However, historically, the legalist social management theory is far less favored by the social rulers than Confucianism.