论文部分内容阅读
语言交际者在进入具体交际事件前拥有各种社会身份,进入交际后无论愿意与否都一定会从若干社会身份中做出有意或无意的选择(由此产生语用身份),甚至构建并不实际存在的身份。不同的语用身份具有的语用价值,对交际方式、过程、得体性、合适性、结果等会产生不同的影响;语用身份选择不当,会产生严重程度不等的后果。本文以一位新闻发言人在新闻发布会上的一段话语为例,从语用身份视角剖析该公共人物的身份选择,解读该话语引发强烈社会反响背后的语用失调,从而为开展批评话语分析提供一个新的理论视角。
Language communicators have a variety of social identities before they enter a particular communicative event. They are bound to make conscious or unintentional choices (thus generating pragmatic identities) from a number of social identities, whether they are willing or not, after entering communicative situations, and even not constructing The actual identity. The pragmatic value of different pragmatic identities will exert different influences on the modes of communication, process, aptitude, suitability, result, etc. The improper choice of pragmatic identities will have consequences of varying degrees of severity. Taking a passage of a news spokesman at a news conference as an example, this article analyzes the identity choice of the public figure from the perspective of pragmatic identity, interprets the pragmatic imbalance behind the strong social repercussion, and analyzes the discourse of critical discourse Provide a new theoretical perspective.