论文部分内容阅读
在洱源县血吸虫病重疫区以村为单位随机分为Ａ、Ｂ两组２０００人进行基线调查。结果表明：Ａ组血防知识及格率为４８．２％，化疗覆盖率６７．６％，人群感染率１６％。Ｂ组血防知识及格率为５４．２％，化疗覆盖率６４．４％，人群感染率１５．４８％。在Ａ组对不同的目标人群选择不同的传播渠道进行健康教育干预，Ｂ组按项目的基本要求执行，不实施健康教育干预。两年后进行效果评估，发现Ａ组人群血防知识及格率９３．３７％，化疗覆盖率９３．３５％，人群血吸虫感染率５．１８％。Ｂ组血防知识及格率５５．８３％，化疗覆盖率６６．７３％，人群感染率１０．８４％。Ａ组人群感染率较Ｂ组下降５２．２％。
In the Eryuan schistosomiasis endemic area, villages were randomly divided into A and B groups of 2000 people for baseline survey. The results showed that: A group of knowledge of blood and pass rate of 48.2%, chemotherapy coverage rate of 67.6%, the crowd infection rate of 16%. The prevalence of blood-borne knowledge in group B was 54.2%, the coverage of chemotherapy was 64.4%, and the infection rate of people was 15.48%. In group A, different communication channels were chosen for different target groups for health education intervention. Group B was implemented according to the basic requirements of the project, and no health education intervention was implemented. Two years later, the results of the evaluation showed that the passing rate of blood-proof knowledge in group A was 93.37%, the coverage rate of chemotherapy was 93.35%, and the rate of schistosomiasis was 5.18%. In group B, the prevalence rate of knowledge on blood-protection was 55.83%, the coverage rate of chemotherapy was 66.73%, and the infection rate of the population was 10.84%. The infection rate in group A was 52.2% lower than that in group B.