论文部分内容阅读
娄师白遗产继承案件涉及的财产主要有三类:第一房屋,第二画作、印章类等艺术品收藏,第三抚恤金,此外还涉及到了身份证明、死亡证明等属于证照类的物品,包括了普通人继承案件中的大部分物品。本案中,各方当事人最为关注的遗产其实是画作、印章等娄先生的个人作品和藏品等艺术品,但法院仅处理了极小一部分,也就是原被告各自承认自己持有的那些娄先生的画作。之所以这样判决,和法院的职能特点有关。法院是居中裁判当事人存在争议的财产权利,裁决的依据是当事人提供的证据,法院不能到当事人家中去搜查物品,一般也不能对查无下落的物
There are mainly three types of property involved in the case of the succession of the Lou Shibai inheritance: the first house, the second painting, the collection of seals and other works of art, and the third pensions. In addition, they also cover such items as certificates of identity and death certificates, including Ordinary people inherit most of the items in the case. In this case, the most concerned legacy of all parties is actually the personal works and collections of paintings by Mr. Lou, such as paintings and seals. However, the court only handled a very small part, that is, the defendants respectively admitted that they own Painting. The reason for such a decision is related to the functional characteristics of the court. Court is the center of the dispute between the parties in dispute the property rights, the ruling is based on evidence provided by the parties, the court can not go to the parties to search for items, generally can not check the whereabouts of the object