论文部分内容阅读
本文是作者1995年10月应台湾大学邀请,在台北“海峡两岸刑事诉讼法学研讨会”会上所作的学术报告摘要。在当代,英美法与大陆法总体上呈现出互相渗透和互相融合的趋势,但在某些重要制度方面,二者仍然存在着原则性区别。譬如在审判制度方面,关于“审判”的概念、审判活动的时间延续性等,两大法系有明显差异。在英美法国家,典型的审判是由陪审团裁决事实、职业法官作法律评判两种活动构成的。
This article is a summary of the academic report made by the author at the Taiwan Symposium on Criminal Procedural Law held in Taipei in October 1995 at the invitation of National Taiwan University. In contemporary times, Anglo-American law and Continental law generally show a tendency of mutual penetration and integration, but there still exist principle differences between the two in some important systems. For example, in the judicial system, there are obvious differences between the two legal systems concerning the concept of “trial” and the time continuity of judicial activities. In Anglo-American law countries, the typical trial consists of jury judgments and professional judges as legal judgments.