论文部分内容阅读
审判委员会(以下简称审委会)作为我国法院内部的最高审判组织,在司法审判工作中发挥着重要作用。审委会的存废之争在我国已经持续了近30年。我国现行的审委会的成员构成非专业化,所受理的案件泛化,讨论案件的程序简单化,做出决议所遵循的原则行政化,因而影响了审委会的社会形象。我们应当推动实现审委会委员的专业化,受理案件的特殊化,讨论程序的法律化,组织原则的民主化,不断完善审委会的工作机制,提升审委会的社会地位。
As the supreme judicial organization within the courts of our country, the judicial committee (hereinafter referred to as the judicial committee) plays an important role in judicial adjudication. The dispute over the existence and abolition of the CRIC in our country has lasted for nearly 30 years. The current trial committee members in our country constitute non-specialization, the cases that are accepted are generalized, the procedures for discussing cases are simplified, and the principles that the resolutions are followed are administratively implemented, thus affecting the social image of the CRIC. We should promote the specialization of CRIC members, accept the specialization of cases, discuss the legalization of procedures, democratize organizational principles, and constantly improve the working mechanism of the CRIC so as to enhance the social status of CRIC.