论文部分内容阅读
行政迟缓是指超过合理时限的违法的行政行为。合理时限因素与行为时的主客观因素、相对人的损失和行政主体提供的理由等因素之一,结合构成行政迟缓。殷朱诉讼案件是否构成行政迟缓的问题最终化约为规定履责期限的内部规范《武汉市公安局110接处警工作规范》是否具有外部效力的问题——虽然作为裁量性行政规则其有实质的外部效力。一审遇到了其没有逾越的职责与义务区隔的障碍。二审判决违背了行政自我拘束原则,轻忽了行政惯例或“预计之行政惯例”的存在,拒绝了认为行政规则具有间接对外效力的通说理论。行政规则不是行政机关的遁生门,也非行政迟缓的法外之地。
Administrative delay refers to illegal administrative actions that exceed a reasonable time limit. Reasonable time-limiting factors and behavior of the subjective and objective factors, the relative loss of people and the reasons given by the administrative body and other factors, combined with administrative delays. Whether the Infringement of Yin Zhu Lawsuit Constitutes a Problem of Administrative Dilemma Finalization is about the Internal Norms for Limiting the Period of Obligation to Make Excuse Whether or not the Wuhan Public Security Bureau 110 Internship Police Work Norms Have the External Effect - Although its substantive as a discretionary administrative rule External validity. The first instance encountered an obstacle to segregation of duties and obligations that it did not overstep. The judgment of the second instance runs counter to the principle of administrative self-restraint, ignoring the existence of administrative routines or “projected administrative routines” and rejecting the doctrine of saying that administrative rules have indirect external validity. Administrative rules are not the escape gate of administrative organs, nor the extrajudicial land of administrative delays.