论文部分内容阅读
本文从西方学术界21世纪初关于欧盟力量的讨论出发,追踪了欧债危机背景下“规范性力量欧洲”在本体论、认识论、方法论层面出现的新变化及其与“市场性力量欧洲”之间展开的辩论。文章认为,尽管两种理论模式在“规范”和“市场”何者是欧盟力量本质特征的问题上存有分歧,但二者间最终呈现的融合与互补态势反映了欧盟通过塑造国际规则和规范实现战略利益的对外政策常态。与此同时,规范性力量研究议程呈现出更具包容性和多样性的取向,特别是将经济自由主义和市场性原则纳入欧盟核心规范体系,欧洲中心论松动等也在一定程度上是西方学术界反思欧盟力量相对下降和国际力量格局变化的新现实后做出的回应,对于我们理解欧盟在国际规范、国际秩序演变中的角色具有重要的理论和政策意义。
Based on the discussion about the EU forces in the early 21st century in the western academia, this paper traces the new changes that the “Normative Forces Europe” has at the level of ontology, epistemology and methodology in the context of the European debt crisis and traces its relationship with the “market power Europe ”debate. The article argues that although the two theoretical models are divided on the issue of what is the essential characteristic of the EU’s forces in the “normative” and the “market”, the ultimate fusion and complementary trend between the two reflects that the EU, through shaping the international Rules and norms to achieve the strategic interests of foreign policy normalcy. At the same time, the research agenda of normative forces has shown a more inclusive and diversified orientation. In particular, economic liberalism and market principles have been incorporated into the EU’s core normative system. The loosening of the European center theory is also to some extent a Western academic The community’s response to the new reality of the relative decline in EU power and changes in the international power has important theoretical and policy implications for us to understand the EU’s role in the evolution of international norms and the international order.