论文部分内容阅读
现在还很难确定6月份突然兴起的有关电子政务的讨论的“第一推力”来自哪里。表面上看来似乎是政府决策,但更多的迹象似乎指向某些类似商业阴谋的举动。经常看到媒体讨论电子政务的必要性、技术标准、运行模式(从而可行性),而有证据表明,这类讨论往往是某家厂商发起或组织的。在“互联网的冬天”尚看不到尽头时,在IT业陷入全球性衰退时,如果电子政务能够像当初的电子商务一样泡沫汹涌,某些即将没顶的企业抓住一块木板的机会自然就出现了。 “商人的趣味总在败坏社会的风俗”,中世纪欧洲贵族的话未必全是偏见。IT厂商们关心电子政务会给他们带来多少商业机会和销售额,某些懵懂或状似懵懂的媒体就在他们的操控下大谈电子政务的技术问题。
It is still hard to determine where the “first lift” from the sudden rise of the e-government debate in June comes from. On the face of it seems that the government decision-making, but more signs seem to point to some similar business conspiracy. There is often evidence of the media’s need to discuss e-government, technical standards, and operational models (and thus feasibility), and there is evidence that such discussions are often initiated or organized by a particular vendor. At a time when Internet industry is in a global recession when “Internet winter” is not yet finished, if e-government can be as explosive as the original e-commerce bubble, some enterprises that are going to be unlucky seize the opportunity of a piece of wood Appeared. “Merchants’ tastes are always corrupting the customs of the community,” and the words of medieval European aristocrats may not be entirely prejudiced. IT vendors are concerned about how many business opportunities and sales e-government will bring them, some ignorant or ignorant media under their control over the technical issues of e-government.