本文以为“夫道未始有封”及“故昔者尧问于舜”二节,乃《庄子》书外篇之羼入于《齐物论》者。对“夫道未始有封”一节,曾有庄学家认为其应属外篇,但论之不详、不深;而对于“故昔者尧问于舜”一节,则未有庄学家疑其非《齐物论》文也。本文从语体风格的辩析上,从对文本的细致解读,以及上下文在意旨及语调的衔接这样三个方面,论证了上述论点。 This article is regarded as “husband and wife did not have a seal” and “the former who Yao asked Yu Shun” two, but “Zhuangzi” outside the book into the “homogeneous things” who. On the section of “Road without seal,” there was a scholar of Chuang-tzu who thought that he should belong to an outer pamphlet, but the theory was unknown and not deep. For the section entitled “Yao Qu Yu and Shun in the Past” “Homogeneous things” text also. This essay argues from the three aspects of stylistic discourse, from the careful interpretation of the text, and from the contextual context in which purpose and intonation converge.