论文部分内容阅读
目的对比分析急性心肌梗死成功介入治疗及成功溶栓治疗的近期疗效和远期疗效。方法收集本院2009年2月~2010年6月期间诊治的急性心肌梗死患者76例作为研究对象,以随机数字表分组的方式分为试验组与对照组,每组患者各38例。对照组患者采用溶栓治疗,试验组患者采用介入治疗,对两组患者的近期疗效和远期疗效进行分析对比。结果研究结果显示,试验组近期疗效优于对照组(P<0.05),而两组患者远期疗效比较统计学无明显差异(P>0.05)有可比性。结论对于急性心肌梗死患者行介入治疗及溶栓治疗均可获得良好的远期疗效,而介入治疗可获得更好的近期疗效。
Objective To compare and analyze the short-term and long-term effects of successful interventional therapy and successful thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Methods A total of 76 acute myocardial infarction patients diagnosed and treated in our hospital from February 2009 to June 2010 were selected as study subjects and divided into experimental group and control group by random number table. Each group included 38 patients. Patients in the control group were treated with thrombolytic therapy. Patients in the test group were treated with interventional therapy, and the short-term and long-term effects were compared and analyzed between the two groups. Results The results showed that the short-term curative effect of the experimental group was better than that of the control group (P <0.05), while the long-term curative effect of the two groups had no significant difference (P> 0.05). Conclusion Interventional therapy and thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction can achieve good long-term efficacy, and interventional therapy can achieve better short-term efficacy.