论文部分内容阅读
要比较和评价某病特征和程度,需有客观指标,否则,即使在同一病区内,相同或不同的调查者的调查结果可有较大差别。作者以定量和定性指标对新疆奎屯地方性砷中毒的病情程度进行了普查,并与预查资料比较,以期为本病防治研究提供参考意见。1 指标和方法1.1指标病区和病人指标的确定均按文献的规定进行1.2方法水砷(mg/L)为≤0.10、0.11～、0.21、0.41和0.61～地区分别划定为可疑、轻、中、重和特重病区。对居民进行普查时严格除外职业、生活和病需接砷者。以皮损单位面积数为据,凡掌跖或
To compare and evaluate the characteristics and extent of a certain disease, objective indicators are required. Otherwise, the survey results of the same or different investigators may be greatly different even in the same ward. The author of quantitative and qualitative indicators of endemic arsenic poisoning in Kuitun, Xinjiang, the extent of the disease were investigated and compared with the pre-screening data in order to provide reference for the prevention and treatment of this disease. 1 indicators and methods 1.1 indicators ward and patient indicators are determined according to the provisions of the literature 1.2 Methods Arsenic (mg / L) for the ≤ 0.10, 0.11 ~ 0.21,0.41 and 0.61 ~ areas were designated as suspicious, light, Medium, heavy and extraordinarily severe ward. Surveys on residents except when strictly excluded occupation, life and disease need arsenic. According to the number of lesions per unit area, palm or plantar