论文部分内容阅读
近日读报,对一篇文章中的一段话有不同意见,其内容如下:“正因为科学工作需要积累,因此把对领导干部的年龄限制推广到科学家,是十分有害的。1999年的诺贝尔科学奖获得者多在60岁以上,三位医学奖获得者全部在70岁以上,都经过了多年的工作积累,才取得今日的成就。如果强迫这三位诺贝尔医学奖获得者在60岁时退休,切断他们的研究工作,他们就不可能成为诺贝尔奖获得者。”在自然科学领域中,纵观一百多年来的诺贝尔科学奖,我们可以发现一个明显事实,那就是获奖的研究工作。几乎都是获奖者们年轻时完成的。1999年两位物理学奖得主的获奖工作,完成于1971—1973年间。那时候其中一位才二十几
Recently read the newspaper, on a piece of the article has a different opinion, its content is as follows: “Because of the need to accumulate scientific work, therefore, the age limit imposed on leading cadres to scientists is very harmful. More than 60 winners of the Bell Science Prize, and three medical award winners all over the age of 70, have accumulated many years of work to achieve today's success if you force the three Nobel Prize winners in 60 When we retire and cut off their work, we can not become Nobel Prize winners. ”In the field of science, one hundred years of Nobel Prize in science, we can find a clear fact that It is the award-winning research work. Almost all of the winners completed in their youth. The two award winners of the physics awards in 1999 completed in 1971-1973. At that time one of them only twenty or so