履行国际义务的外在推力、广东低碳经济发展内在需要以及立法经验缺失等促使了《广东省碳排放管理试行办法》的出台。该试行办法在立法目标、原则的确定以及制度、机制的设计等方面取得了不少成功经验,其实施也取得了促使控排企业碳排放量下降、助力加快“去产能”步伐、碳交易产业链得到培育等社会效果。但也瑜中有瑕,存在着合法性不足、部分条款虚置、制度可操作性不强等诸多问题。当前,应当借鉴美国加利福尼亚州碳排放交易立法的有益经验,将该试行办法上升为地方性法规,并完善其立法目的与原则、健全碳排放交易的法律保障机制以及与相关制度的有效衔接和协调,从而实现现实背景下广东碳排放交易管理立法的最优化。 External promulgation of fulfilling international obligations, inherent needs of low-carbon economy in Guangdong, and lack of legislative experience contributed to the promulgation of the “Measures for the Trial Implementation of Guangdong Province’s Carbon Emission Management.” The pilot scheme has gained a lot of successful experiences in legislation objectives, principles, and system and mechanism design. Its implementation has also made it possible for carbon emission control companies to reduce their carbon emissions, help accelerate the pace of production capacity reduction, and carbon Trade industry chain has been nurtured and other social effects. However, there are also flaws in Yu. There are many problems such as lack of legitimacy, some articles falsehoods and poor system operability. At present, we should draw lessons from the beneficial experiences of California’s carbon emissions trading legislation in the United States, elevate the pilot scheme to local laws and regulations, improve its legislative purposes and principles, improve the legal guarantee mechanism for carbon emissions trading, and effectively link and coordinate with relevant systems , So as to realize the optimization of Guangdong’s carbon emissions trading management legislation under the realistic background.