通过课程改革我们接受了“课程”的概念,知道了“课程”的重要性。从学者摆正的课程观中,教师们明白了过去对课程的狭窄理解是何等的不对。教师们还在专家的引领下,有了自主开发课程的愿望。这一切都让我们感到欣慰,因为教师自己能够对他们的工作对象和环境有了一定的支配能力。我同样赞叹历史课程改革取得的进步。其一,“以学生为本”的主张,让历史教育有了伸展个性的机会;其二,突出人类文明史的价值,使历史学习获得了不小的发展空间。但是,无论是史学界对中小学历史教育的(自觉)关注程度,还是历史学科教育界(特别是理论研究水平)对中小学历史教育的直接作用,都不能很好地支撑如此理念的贯彻执行。前者如源于史学家的淡漠或 Through the reform of the curriculum we have accepted the notion of “course” and learned the importance of “course”. From the scholarly perspective of the curriculum, teachers understand how the narrow understanding of the curriculum in the past was wrong. Under the guidance of experts, teachers also have the desire to develop their own courses. All of this makes us feel relieved that teachers themselves have a certain degree of control over their work targets and environment. I also applaud the progress made in the reform of the history curriculum. First, “student-oriented ” advocate, so that history education has the opportunity to stretch personality; Second, highlighting the value of human civilization history, history learning gained no small room for development. However, neither the (historically) concern of (consciously) history education in primary and secondary schools nor the direct role of history education (especially theoretical research) on history education in primary and secondary schools can well support the implementation of such ideas . The former is derived from the indifference of historians or