论文部分内容阅读
无论是研究先秦历史 ,还是研究先秦历史散文 ,大都《左传》、《国语》并提 ,但长期以来 ,研究学者多习惯于把《国语》作为介绍《左传》而连带的一个附庸 ,它的价值似乎也只在于它是《左传》巨大成就的一个有力的反衬。而事实上 ,就历史研究而言 ,《左传》重在记事 ,分年编写 ;《国语》重在记言 ,按国叙述 ,两者可相互参证 ,相互补充。就文学价值而言 ,无论是记事、记人 ,还是记言 ,《国语》都有可与《左传》比肩之处。
Whether it is studying the history of the pre-Qin period, or studying the historical essays in the pre-Qin period, most of them are “Zuo Zhuan” and “Mandarin.” However, for a long time, researchers are more accustomed to using “Mandarin” as a vassal in introducing Zuo Zhuan The value seems to lie only in that it is a powerful contrast to the great achievements of Zuo Zhuan. In fact, as far as historical studies are concerned, Zuo Zhuan focuses on notations and is prepared year after year. For the history of Mandarin, emphasis is placed on remembering words and describing each country according to the country. As far as the literary value is concerned, both “mengyu” and “Zuozhuan” can stand shoulder-to-shoulder with Zuo Zhuan.