论文部分内容阅读
刘彦和《文心雕龙·辨骚》之“博徒”之解诂有极端化、简单化、模式化倾向。“博徒”词义自《史记》之后发生细微之变化。应当根据《文心雕龙·辨骚》之文意以定“博徒”之具体涵义。此博徒亦当训英杰,但又不同于完全褒义之英杰,即非正途出身之英杰,实属历经曲折而终入正途之英杰。《文心雕龙·知音》之“博徒”用为贬义不可作为《文心雕龙·辨骚》之“博徒”也必用为贬义之证据,二者应依语境不同区别对待。
Liu Yan and “Wen Xin Diao Long Bian Sao” “Bodo ” solution has extreme, simplistic, patterning tendency. “Bodo ” meaning since the “Historical Records” after the subtle changes. It should be based on the “Wen Xin Diao Long Bian Sao” in the text to set the “Bodo ” the specific meaning. This apprentice is also a disciple of Yingjie, but also different from the totally commendable Yingjie, that is, Yingjie, who came from a different path. The “Bodhisattva” of “Wen Xin Diao Long · Zhiyin” can not be used as derogatory meaning as the “Bodhisattva” of “Literary Mind and Carving Dragons · Differentiation of Mansions”. It must also be used as evidence of derogatory meaning. Both should be treated according to different contexts .