论文部分内容阅读
近日,厦门大学学生完成一组实验:在绿化带内放置不同语气的警示标语,结果显示,“请走人行天桥”这类传统宣传标语收效甚微,而“你丑你横穿”的标语效果却最为显著,行人横穿率直降约三成。针对如此另类标语,网友展开了热烈讨论,并有网友发出,标语就应该有冲击效应,这样的标语多多益善;反对者则认为,这种标语含有明显的暴力色彩,“以暴制暴”不可取。对此,你怎么看?
Recently, students from Xiamen University completed a series of experiments: Placing warning signs with different tones in the green belt showed that the traditional propaganda slogans such as “walk on the pedestrian bridge” had little effect, and “you ugly you cross” “The slogan is the most significant effect, pedestrian crossing straight down about 30%. In response to such an alternative slogan, netizens started a lively discussion, and some netizens sent out slogans that should have an impact effect. Such slogans are much better and better; opponents argue that such slogans contain obvious violent colors and that they ” Not desirable. What do you think of it?