论文部分内容阅读
本文针对方东美先生的朱熹诠释意见作理论的反思。方东美先生其讨论之方式为认定宋儒依据道佛立论,故而种种命题皆成乖谬。笔者从哲学基本问题意识的再为厘清,为朱熹多有辩护,但亦从中见出,传统中国哲学的解读工作仍是一大疏漏之领域,当代学者间的共识颇为缺乏,若不好好开发研究工具,则此种误解批评的现象仍将持续发生。就方先生对宋儒的做法而言,他认同于三教会通,这是值得肯定的态度,但是若缺乏良好的术语工具,便不能有效诠释各家的理论,以致只能见其不易厘清的缺失,而不能察其各自有益的建构。
This article aims at the theoretical reflection of Mr. ZHU Dong’s interpretation of opinion. The way in which Mr. Fang Dongmei discussed it was to identify Sung Confucianism as an argument based on Taoism and Buddhism, so all kinds of propositions are absurd. From the point of view of philosophical basic problems, the author defended Zhu Xi more, but from this we can see that the interpretation of traditional Chinese philosophy is still a big omission field. There is a lack of consensus among contemporary scholars. If we do not develop well Research tools, the phenomenon of such misunderstanding will continue to occur. Regarding Mr. Fang’s approach to Song Confucianism, he agrees with the three religions, which is a sure way to proceed. However, without a good terminology tool, his theory can not be effectively interpreted so that only his easily identifiable Lack, but not their respective beneficial construction.