歐陽信本所書碑銘,多有歲月可稽,獨此《皇甫》,遂無所考。竊以《皇甫》立碑年月不明,非止一石一家之事,實有關吾人於歐書乃至書法藝術史之窺悟體認者甚鉅,是真不能不稍稍參稽史册與前人評訂而一爲考辨者也。舊說多謂《皇甫》乃信本少時書。若晚近通行辭書,東邦碑帖釋語,悉沿舊意,或稱壯歲,或謂盛年。總之非老筆而已。以常情揆之,此說非無所見而云 Ouyang letter of the book inscriptions, there are many years can be ridiculous, the only “Huangfu”, then no test. Stolen to “Huangfu” erected in unknown years, more than a stone thing, in fact, about our people in the European calligraphy and even the history of the art of recognizing the great glimpse of the person, is really not a little scholarly history book with predecessors rating And one for the examiner also. The old saying that more than “Huangfu” is the letter of the timebook. If the recent passage dictionaries, Dongbiao rubbings interpretation, along the old meaning, or strong-year-old, or that Sheng years. In short non-old pen only. With common sense, the saying goes without a cloud