论文部分内容阅读
目的评价不同健康教育模式对宾馆,职工食堂,饭店等餐饮业单位外来务工人员艾滋病知识和态度的干预效果。方法将在灵宝市疾病预防控制中心参加健康体检的外来务工人员随机分为4组,其中3个干预组,1个空白组。结果集中宣教、集中宣教和观看VCD、观看VCD和空白对照4种方法有统计学意义(P<0.05),进行两两比较集中宣教,观看VCD和集中宣教比较无统计学意义(P>0.05),观看VCD和空白对照比较无统计学意义,其他两两比较均有统计学意义。外来务工人员对艾滋病态度4组之间有统计学意义(P<0.001),两两比较只有集中宣教,观看VCD和空白组有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论不同干预措施有不同的干预效果,其中集中宣教和发放宣传资料,观看VCD效果最好。
Objective To evaluate the effects of different health education modes on HIV / AIDS knowledge and attitudes among migrant workers in hotels, staff canteens, restaurants and other restaurants. Methods The migrant workers participating in the physical examination in Lingbao CDC were randomly divided into 4 groups, including 3 intervention groups and 1 blank group. Results There were statistically significant differences between the four methods of centralized mission, centralized mission and watching VCD, watching VCD and blank control (P <0.05) , There was no significant difference between VCD and blank control, and the other pairs were statistically significant. Migrant workers on AIDS attitude among the four groups were statistically significant (P <0.001), compared with only one pair of focus on missionary, watching VCD and the blank group was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion Different interventions have different intervention effects. Among them, they focus on education and dissemination of propaganda materials and watch VCDs to be the best.