论文部分内容阅读
法院“顶格”判决,却仍让人们觉得震慑力不足,就需考虑社会发展的现实情况,在立法上与时俱进先后发生在杭州、南京、成都的严重超速、醉驾等3起交通肇事,连日来引起了公众的强烈关注。成都醉驾者一审以危害公共安全罪被判死刑、南京醉驾者以危害公共安全罪被批准逮捕,杭州“5·7”交通肇事案被告人胡斌以交通肇事罪一审判决3年。一系列事件,不断引发公众对法律公平正义的争议乃至质疑。《瞭望》新闻周刊记者在调查中发现,
Court “top grid ” judgments, but still make people feel less deterrent force, we must consider the reality of social development, with the times in the legislation took place in Hangzhou, Nanjing, Chengdu, a serious speeding, drunk driving and other three traffic The accident has aroused strong public concern in recent days. Chengdu drunk driver first trial was sentenced to death for crimes against public safety, Nanjing drunk driving to endangering public safety was approved arrest, Hangzhou “5.7 ” traffic accident defendant Hu Bin to traffic accident first instance verdict for three years. A series of events continue to spark public controversy over the fairness and justice of the law and even question it. “Outlook” Newsweek reporter found in the survey,