论文部分内容阅读
[目的/意义]“互联网+”环境下图书馆学科服务的广度与深度应该进一步拓展,在学科发展与评估中发挥积极的作用。[方法/过程]首先分析学科服务、学术计量与学科评估的现状,对自然出版指数的评估方法加以改造,利用期刊的被引半衰期对期刊影响因子加以修正,引入通讯作者、多种期刊分区、H5指数等因素进行加权。在此基础上,参照替代计量的理念,利用Wo S、EBSCO、Elsevier等商业数据库与第三方开源组织的核心接口,构建一个实时跟踪的学术影响力评价体系。[结果/结论]实践体现两个特点:实时跟踪与计量指标的综合性和客观性。[局限]评价体系需要在实践中进一步验证其效果。
[Purpose / Significance] The breadth and depth of library discipline services in the environment of “Internet + ” should be further expanded and played an active role in the development and evaluation of disciplines. [Method / Process] Firstly, the status quo of subject service, academic metrology and subject evaluation is analyzed, the evaluation method of natural publishing index is modified, the influential factors of journals are corrected by the cited half-life of the journal, H5 index and other factors to be weighted. On this basis, with reference to the concept of alternative measurement, a commercial real-time tracking academic influence evaluation system is constructed by using the core interfaces of commercial databases such as Wo S, EBSCO and Elsevier and third-party open source organizations. [Results / Conclusions] Practice reflects two characteristics: real-time tracking and measurement of the comprehensiveness and objectivity. [Limitations] The evaluation system needs to be further validated in practice.