论文部分内容阅读
2007年5月23日至8月1日,不到3个月时间,S市卫生局应当事人申请对两起处罚案件举行了两次听证会。非常“巧合”地,两起案件呈现出6个“相同”:案件的当事人相同,均为H大厦;经营项目相同,均为餐饮服务;违法行为相同,均为“无证”;发案原因相同,皆因消费者投诉而发;投诉内容相同,皆为食品内有异物;适用的处罚程序相同,皆经听证程序。案件所暴露出的卫生执法工作中存在的缺陷值得反思。
May 23, 2007 to August 1, less than 3 months, S City Health Bureau, the parties should apply for two cases of punishment held two hearings. In the case of “coincidence”, the two cases show 6 “same”: the same parties in the case are both H buildings; the same business items are all catering services; the same illegal activities are both “unlicensed ”; The same reason for the crime, all because of consumer complaints and issued; complaints the same content, all foreign food; applicable punishment procedures are subject to hearing procedures. The flaws in the health law enforcement work exposed by the case deserve reflection.