论文部分内容阅读
一、教学目的的确定 (一)教学目的 1、了解本文作者通过一个“博鸡者”见义勇为的故事讥讽朝政、针砭时弊的写作意图。 2、认识本文所反映的元末政治腐败的社会现实。 3、掌握本文中词性活用的文言句法特点。 (二)确定以上教学目的的依据 1、本文作者高启(1336——1374)生活在元末明初年间。元朝末年,政府卖官鬻爵,官吏贪污受贿,贵族僧侣飞扬跋扈,地主豪强专横霸道,一切腐败现象达于极点。高启对这种社会现实深恶痛绝。他的这篇《书博鸡者事》,通过一个“博鸡者”见义勇为、折辱豪绅、为民请命的真实故事,深刻揭露了统治阶级徇私枉法的罪行,痛斥了昏愦腐朽的“为上者”,发出了“元政紊弛而变兴自下之渐”的呼声,歌颂了惩治豪民、为被诬者申冤的勇士。作品通过“博鸡者”与“为上者”的对比说明:对好人凭空受诬陷而被治罪的冤案,专司监察的行御史台不但不去检查,当见义勇为者把状纸送上门来时还不受理,其昏愦腐朽到了何等地步!他们简直还不如一个“无赖”!“无赖”还有点正义感,他们却没有。作品虽然用主要篇幅叙述“博鸡者”见义勇为、折辱豪绅、为民请命的故事,但画龙点睛之笔却在结尾。这种写法,很有点象白居易提倡的“卒章显志”法。这是本文的一大特点。 2、“博鸡者”的形象是本文的教学重点,应着重分析他见义勇为的两个表现。但作者不是单纯
First, the determination of the purpose of teaching (a) the purpose of teaching 1, to understand the author of this article through a “big chicken” the courageous story of ridiculing politics, criticizing the writing intentions. 2. Recognize the social reality of political corruption in the end of the Yuan reflected in this article. 3. Master the characteristics of the use of words and phrases in this article. (B) determine the basis for the above teaching objectives 1, the author of this article Gao Qi (1336 - 1374) lived in the late Ming and early Ming Dynasty. In the last years of the Yuan Dynasty, the government sold officials, the bureaucrats corrupted and accepted bribes, the aristocrat monks flew, the landlords were extravagant and overbearing, and all corruption was at its peak. Gao Qi abhors this social reality. His book, “The Brothers in the Book”, through a true story of “breading chickens” who are brave, insulting, and ordering for the people, has profoundly exposed the crimes committed by the ruling class in favor of private law, and denounced the faint and decadent “ The “person” issued a cry for the “decline of the Yuan dynasty and the change of the economy” and praised the warriors who punished the people and claimed their lives for the beggars. The works illustrate the comparison between the “Big Chicken” and the “Above One”: The case of a good man being accused of falling victim to a fall is not only not subject to inspection, but also when the volunteers send the paper to the door. It is not yet admissible, and its faintness and decay have reached a point where they are simply not as good as a “rogue”! The “rogue” is just a sense of justice. They are not. Although the work described the main story of the story of “Brook Chicken” as a matter of bravery, disgrace, and ordering for the people, the finishing touch is at the end. This type of writing is a bit like the “Breakout” method promoted by Bai Juyi. This is a major feature of this article. 2. The image of “Brook Chicken” is the teaching focus of this article. It should focus on analyzing the two manifestations of his bravery. But the author is not simply