论文部分内容阅读
最密切联系原则广泛适用于涉外民事关系的法律选择,体现出丰富的理论价值与实践意义。原则本身追求的是冲突规则与实质正义之间的平衡。但是原则概念的不明确性也容易引发判决不一、法律稳定性低、法官自由裁量权过大等问题。尤其在涉外合同领域,必须对最密切联系原则加以规范。中国在适用该原则时存在立法上的缺陷与司法上的误区,需要紧紧抓住民法典修纂之契机,优化立法模式、规范司法实践,使最密切联系原则达到灵活性与规范性的统一,更好地服务涉外合同领域法律适用。
The principle of closest contact is widely applicable to the legal choice of foreign-related civil relations and embodies a wealth of theoretical and practical significance. The principle itself pursues the balance between conflict rules and substantive justice. However, the ambiguity of the concept of principle can easily lead to different judgments, low legal stability and excessive discretion of judges. Especially in the field of foreign-related contracts, the principle of the most intimate contact must be regulated. When applying this principle, China has some legislative flaws and misunderstandings in its judiciary. China needs to grasp the turning point of the codification of civil code, optimize the legislative model, standardize judicial practice, achieve the unity of flexibility and normativeness in the principle of closest contact, To better serve the law applicable in the field of foreign-related contracts.