“江东六十四屯者,黑龙江左岸地,精奇里河而南至豁尔莫勒津屯一带是也”(《黑龙江志稿·交涉志》)。这里就是清光绪二十六年(1900年)被沙俄用武力强占、久未归还的地方。近来偶读《瑷珲历史论文集》,见书中关于江东六十四屯的几篇论文,于六十四屯的地理位置、名称及演变情况等都做了有益的考证,个人读后很受启发。只是其中在涉及到清人徐宗亮《黑龙江述略》所记述的江左“满洲旗户四十三屯”问题上,各家理解略有分歧,还有辨明的必要。兹据黑龙江将军衙门档案的有关记载,草此短文,就正于研究者与读者,不对之处,尚祈指正。关于江左六十四屯旗屯数目的演变过程,有的研究者曾列举文献,指出“这个地区曾被称作二十八屯(《西巡本末大事纪》)、三十余屯(奕山奏折,见《咸丰朝筹办夷务始末》),四十八屯(《清史稿》)等称谓”,直至1900年以前称六十 “Jiangdong sixty-four Tuen, Heilongjiang left bank, Jingqi River and south to Malmo Jin Tuen area is also” (“Heilongjiang volunteer blog”). Here is the twenty-six years Guangxu (1900) occupied by Russia by force Russia, long time no return of the place. Recently, I read a series of essays on the history of 瑷 珲. I read a few papers on the sixty-four Tuen of Jiangdong and did useful research on the geographical location, name and evolution of 64 Tuen. Inspired. However, on the issue concerning the “leftist Manchuria Fortune Fortune” recorded by Qing Zuoliang “Heilongjiang Review”, Qing dynasty understands that there are some differences and there is a need to identify it. According to the records of General Archives of Heilongjiang Province, the essay on grass is precisely what the researcher and the reader are wrong with. As for the evolution of the number of Qiongsun Township in the left of the 54th left, some researchers have cited the literature and pointed out that “the area was once called” 28 Pagun “(the” West Passage “), while more than 30 Tuen Memorandum, see ”Xianfeng North Korea preparatory office“), forty-eight Tuen (”history of the draft“) and other titles, ”until 1900 before the said 60