立法中常出现法律精神与现实情况的冲突。立法者如何取舍,实为立法过程中的两难。有取舍的立法措施导致“立法妥协”。立法妥协现象,其原因并非立法者有意为之,应归结于历史发展必然受到各种力量作用影响之普遍规律。合力创造历史,法律是妥协的产物,妥协并非贬义,也不是没有原则的消极中庸,而是立法者为了保证法律适时出台、有效实施,审时度势的作为。妥协的欠缺往往使法律成为一纸空文。选择合理妥协则能协调矛盾,达到目的。现象原因论恩格斯的合力论,阐述了历史是在必然性和偶然性的合力作用下发展的:强调最终的结果是从许多单个的意志的相互冲突中产生出来的,而最后出现的结果是谁都没有希望过的事物。此合 Conflicts between the spirit of law and the reality often appear in legislation. How to choose the legislator is actually a dilemma in the legislative process. The trade-off legislative measures lead to “legislative compromise.” The reason for the compromise of legislation is not the reason for legislators to do so. It should be attributed to the general law that historical development must be affected by various forces. To work together to create history and law is a product of compromise. Compromise is not derogatory nor is it a negative doctrine without principles. Instead, it is the act of legislators in order to ensure the timely introduction of laws, effectively implement and assess the situation. The lack of compromise tends to make law a dead letter. Choose a reasonable compromise will be able to coordinate conflicts and achieve their goals. On the Engels’ Theory of Cohesion, Ezgerald elaborates that history develops with the synergy of necessity and contingency: it emphasizes that the final result is generated from the mutual conflicts among many individual wills, and the last consequence is that no one Hope This together