论文部分内容阅读
黄侃在儒家經書上用功至深,曾三次手批《白文十三經》。在熟讀注疏的基礎上,黄氏用朱、墨兩類符識分别將《春秋》《左傳》的正字、注音、校勘等文本問題,以及左氏漢儒師説、三傳異文異説、諸書所見左氏經傳異文異説等解釋問題逐一標出,構成了一張龐大的左氏學知識網絡,具有極高的學術價值。黄氏這種朱墨批校的治經方法,可能師法漢儒。黄侃圈點斷句雖以杜注爲準,但並非尊崇杜氏學。黄氏推崇漢儒舊注,駁斥杜氏新説,這反映出其左氏學立場更近於劉師培,異於中晚年的章太炎。
Huang Kan in the Confucian classics diligently, has three times approved “Ba Wen Thirteen.” On the basis of familiar notes and punctuation, Huang uses the two kinds of symbols of Zhu and Mo to separate the orthographic, phonetic and colloquial textual issues of Chunqiu and Zuo Zhuan, , The book see Zuo’s different texts and other interpretation of the problem one by one marked to form a huge Zuozhi knowledge network, with high academic value. Huang Zhu Mo batch school rule the way, may teach French Confucianism Confucianism. Although the punctual sentence of Puning punctuation is subject to Du Note, but not respected Du’s science. Huang respected the old Confucianism Confucianism, refuted Du’s new theory, which reflects his Zuo’s position closer to Liu Shipei, different from Zhang Taiyan middle and old age.