论文部分内容阅读
实验语义学家对东西方人的指称直觉进行测试调查,调查结果显示:克里普克的指称理论并非一个普遍的理论,而是相对西方文化圈而真。西方人拥有因果直觉,东方人拥有描述直觉。针对该调查,本文提出了一个为实验语义学共同体所忽视的问题:指称测试所要分析的不仅仅是数据,而是受试者选择答案背后的理由。基于该思路进行的分析和调查得出了与实验语义学家的测试不同的结果,这是对实验语义学进路的一个可能修正。
The experimental semantics tests and tests the alleged intuition of eastern and western people. The survey results show that Kripke’s referential theory is not a universal theory, but rather relative to the Western cultural circle. Westerners have a causal intuition, Oriental has a description of intuition. In response to this survey, this article presents a problem that is neglected by the community of experimental semantics: the allegation test analyzes more than just the data, but the rationale behind the subject’s choice of answer. The analysis and investigation based on this idea lead to different results from those of experimental semantics, which is a possible amendment to the experimental semantics.