论文部分内容阅读
面对我国近年来普遍出现的“狗咬人”事件,无论是私了还是从立法到司法实务中往往均有明确的解决方式。然而,实践中即本文将要描述的“杜高犬咬伤保安”事件中出现了狗主人认为被咬者在反抗狗的撕咬中误伤甚至致狗死亡时,拒接支付被咬者赔偿费用的情况,该行为的性质在法律上应该如何界定,狗主人的这一要求是否合理,应该如何从法律层面解决这一“人狗互伤”的赔偿问题等等,这些不仅是个道德问题,更是个值得探讨的法律问题。
Faced with the widespread “dog bite” incident in our country in recent years, there is often a clear solution both in private and legislative practice to judicial practice. However, in practice, this article will describe the “Dogo Dog bite security ” incident occurred when the dog owners believe that the bite in the dog’s bite in the accidental injury or even death of the dog, refused to pay to pay the bite compensation How to define the nature of the act in the law, whether the request of the owner of the dog is reasonable and how to solve this “compensation for human beings and dogs” from the legal aspect, etc. These are not just morals Problems, it is a legal issue worth exploring.