论文部分内容阅读
司法审判在定纷止争方面起着不可或缺的作用。然而,当诉讼被过度使用于纠纷解决时,法院将不堪重负,从而导致诉讼迟延、诉讼成本过高,以及投入的司法资源无法与诉讼量增长的速度相适应等问题的产生。这就说明解决群体性纠纷除了司法诉讼,还必须借助于人民调解、协商、信访制度、行政机关先行处理等替代性纠纷解决机制。为此,我们必须树立多元化解决纠纷的观念,充分发挥替代性机制在解决群体解纷中的功能;必须充分发挥人民调解在解决群体性纠纷中的功能,适时的启动强制性行政先行处理程序,并努力实现各种解纷机制的衔接与互补。
Judicial adjudication plays an indispensable role in determining disputes. However, when the lawsuit is overused in dispute resolution, the court will be overwhelmed, resulting in the delay of the lawsuit, the high cost of the lawsuit and the incompatibility of the judicial resources invested with the speed of lawsuit growth. This shows that in order to solve mass disputes, besides judicial proceedings, we must resort to people’s mediation, consultation, letters and visits system, administrative agencies and other alternative dispute resolution mechanism. To this end, we must foster a pluralistic concept of dispute resolution and give full play to the function of alternative mechanisms in resolving disputes among mass groups. We must give full play to the functions of people’s mediation in settling mass disputes and promptly initiate mandatory administrative prior procedures , And strive to achieve convergence and complementarity of various dispute resolution mechanisms.