论文部分内容阅读
用微机QRP法和W W法计算 2 49批百日咳菌苗的效力 ,结果二者在总体上差异无显著意义。 2 0 9批配对数据分析表明 ,二者合格的符合率为 81.34 % ,不合格的符合率为 14.83% ,总符合率为 96 .17% ,不符合率占3.83%。在这 3.83%中 ,皆为用W W法。用W W法计算在合格边缘而用QRP法计算合格的制品 ,因此 ,微机QRP法计算的合格率显著高于W W法。用W W法不能计算的占 2 .81% ,用QRP法则很易完成 ,差异也有显著意义。QRP法计算的直线性平行性检验不成立的为 13.2 5 % ,5批经过复试 ,此 2种检验皆获通过。
Using computer QRP method and W method to calculate the potency of 2 49 batches of pertussis vaccine, the results in both the overall difference was not significant. The analysis of 2 0 9 batches of data showed that the qualified rate of the two was 81.34%, the unqualified rate was 14.83%, the total compliance rate was 96.17% and the non-compliance rate was 3.83%. In this 3.83%, all with W W method. W W method is used to calculate the qualified products by the QRP method at the qualified edge. Therefore, the pass rate calculated by the computer QRP method is significantly higher than the W W method. Using W W method can not be calculated accounted for 2.81%, QRP law is very easy to complete, the difference is also significant. The linear parallelism test calculated by the QRP method did not hold 13.2 5% and the 5 batches were retested. Both tests were approved.