陆一帆教授以历史唯物主义作为逻辑起点,对文艺本质问题作了长期的、深入的、审慎的思考,继承和发展了普列汉诺夫关于“文艺与社会心理”的学说,颇有见地地提出了“所有艺术都是社会心理的直接反映”,“社会心理是文艺的直接源泉”等崭新的理论观点。这对于传统的文艺观点,不啻是一个强有力的挑战,堪称为“一家之言”。然而,当我对其《关于文艺本质问题的思考提纲》(下简称《提纲》)进行再思考时,却又觉得有的提法欠妥。 (一) 把文艺本质定义为“所有艺术都是社会心理的直接反映”是否恰当?理由有三:第一,普列汉诺夫关于“文艺与社会心理”的学说,并非探讨和论述文艺本质问题的,而是探讨和回答恩格斯晚年提出的但尚未解决的包括文艺在内的各种意识形态。是由什么样的方式和方法产生的问 Professor Lu Yifan took the historical materialism as the starting point of logic and made long-term, deep and prudent thinking on the essence of literature and art. He inherited and developed Plekhanov’s doctrine on “art and social psychology” All the art is a direct reflection of social psychology “,” social psychology is the direct source of literature and art “and other brand new theoretical point of view. This is a strong challenge to the traditional literary point of view, which can be called ”one of the words.“ However, when I re-think my ”Outline of Thinking on the Essence of Literature and Art“ (”Outline“ for short), I found that some of the references were not correct. (1) It is appropriate to define the essence of literature and art as ”All art is a direct reflection of social psychology“ for three reasons: First, Plekhanov’s theory of ”literature and art and social psychology" is not to discuss and discuss the essence of literature and art But to explore and answer various ideologies, including literature and art, that have been proposed by Engels in his later years. Is what kind of ways and means produced by the question