论文部分内容阅读
目的:重点探索轮状病毒腹泻患儿接受喜炎平注射液治疗的有效性。方法:挑选的研究对象是2011年1月1日至2014年12月31日在我院接受治疗的72例轮状病毒腹泻患儿,将轮状病毒腹泻患儿随机分成例数相同的两组,喜炎平注射液应用于治疗36例观察组,利巴韦林注射液应用于治疗36例对照组,对比两种注射液对轮状病毒腹泻患儿的影响。结果:对照组的康复效果稍差,优良率仅仅达到83.33%。观察组的康复效果较好,优良率高达97.22%。观察组的优良率显著高于对照组,两组轮状病毒腹泻患儿的康复效果有明显差异(P<0.05)。对照组的退热时间、脱水纠正时间、止泻时间明显比观察组长。观察组的康复速度明显比对照组快。两组轮状病毒腹泻患儿的康复时间有明显差异(P<0.05)。结论:轮状病毒腹泻患儿接受喜炎平注射液治疗的有效性非常高,患儿的康复速度较快,值得推荐。
Objective: To explore the effectiveness of Xiyanping injection in children with rotavirus diarrhea. Methods: The selected subjects were 72 rotavirus diarrhea children treated in our hospital from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2014. The children with rotavirus diarrhea were randomly divided into two groups of the same number Xiyanping injection was used to treat 36 cases of observation group and Ribavirin injection was used to treat 36 cases of control group. The effects of two injections on children with rotavirus diarrhea were compared. Results: The effect of rehabilitation in the control group was slightly worse, the excellent and good rate was only 83.33%. Observation group’s rehabilitation effect is good, excellent and good rate as high as 97.22%. The excellent and good rate of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group, and the rehabilitation effect of the two groups of rotavirus diarrhea was significantly different (P <0.05). Control group antipyretic time, dehydration correction time, antidiarrheal time significantly shorter than the observation team leader. The recovery rate of the observation group was significantly faster than that of the control group. The rehabilitation time of two groups of rotavirus diarrhea was significantly different (P <0.05). Conclusions: The effectiveness of Xiyanping Injection in treating children with rotavirus diarrhea is very high, and the rehabilitation rate of children is faster, which is worthy of recommendation.