论文部分内容阅读
1996年8月,上海各大媒体相继报导了一条有关第一中级人民法院审理的一起投币机专利侵权的新闻。原告是一家专业研制、生产投币机的单位,从1993年起,产品已广泛使用于30多个公交企业的无人售票车辆上,产生了市场规模效应。原告发现,当时被告仿造了他们的专利投币机,并对外低价销售,还以原告联营厂的名义作不实宣传,甚至在某县电视台公然介绍推销其侵权产品。根据我国知识产权保护法,在掌握了被告
In August 1996, various major media outlets in Shanghai reported one piece of news about the patent infringement of a coin-operated machine first-instance court. The plaintiff is a professional development, production coin machine units, since 1993, the product has been widely used in more than 30 bus companies unmanned ticket vehicles, resulting in the market size effect. The plaintiff found that the defendants had copied their patented slot machines and sold them outside at a low price. They also made false propaganda on behalf of the plaintiffs affiliated factories, and even publicly introduced and sold their infringing products on a county television station. According to China’s law on the protection of intellectual property, the accused is in control