论文部分内容阅读
《中华人民共和国政府信息公开条例》第三十三条扩张了行政诉讼的受案范围,缔造了新的行政诉讼类型——政府信息公开诉讼。但由于《行政诉讼法》与《中华人民共和国政府信息公开条例》衔接上的空白,导致政府信息公开行政诉讼中诸多事实的证明陷入法规范的“空白地带”。其中申请人与申请公开政府信息的相关性、申请公开政府信息属免予公开的政府信息、申请公开政府信息不存在等事实的证明都需要在现有证明规范基础上进一步明确。
Article 33 of the “Regulations for the Disclosure of Government Information of the People’s Republic of China” has expanded the scope of acceptance of administrative litigation and created a new type of administrative litigation - the public information litigation of government information. However, due to the gap between the “Administrative Procedure Law” and the “Regulations of the People’s Republic of China on the Disclosure of Government Information,” many evidences in administrative litigation of government information have become trapped in the “blank space ”. The correlation between the applicants and the application for public government information, the application of the government information for public disclosure to be exempt from public government information and the fact that the application for public government information does not exist need to be further clarified on the basis of the existing proofs.