Role of original and modified Frey's procedures in chronic pancreatitis

来源 :World Journal of Gastroenterology | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:xiaobaihuo197992
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
AIM To retrospectively review patients with chronic pancreatitis(CP) treated with Frey’s procedures between January 2009 and January 2014.METHODS A retrospective review was performed of patients with CP treated with Frey’s procedures between January 2009 and January 2014 in the Department of Pancreatic Surgery. A cross-sectional study of postoperative pain relief, quality of life(Qo L), and alcohol and nicotine abuse was performed by clinical interview, letters and telephone interview in January 2016. Qo L of patients was evaluated with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire(EORTC QLQ-C30) version 3.0. The patients were requested to fill in the questionnaires by themselves via correspondence or clinical interview.RESULTS A total of 80 patients were enrolled for analysis, including 44 who underwent the original Frey’s procedure and 36 who underwent a modified Frey’s procedure. The mean age was 46 years in the original group and 48 years in the modified group. Thirtyfive male patients(80%) were in the original group and 33(92%) in the modified group. There were no differences in the operating time, blood loss, and postoperative morbidity and mortality between the two groups. The mean follow-up was 50.3 mo in the original group and 48.7 mo in the modified group. There were no differences in endocrine and exocrine function preservation between the two groups. The original Frey’s procedure resulted in significantly betterpain relief, as shown by 5-year follow-up(P = 0.032), better emotional status(P = 0.047) and fewer fatigue symptoms(P = 0.028). When stratifying these patients by the M-ANNHEIM severity index, no impact was found on pain relief after the two types of surgery.CONCLUSION The original Frey’s procedure is as safe as the modified procedure, but the former yields better pain relief. The severity of CP does not affect postoperative pain relief. AIM To retrospectively review patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP) treated with Frey’s procedures between January 2009 and January 2014. METHHODS A retrospective review was performed of patients with CP treated with Frey’s procedures between January 2009 and January 2014 in the Department of Pancreatic Surgery. A cross-sectional study of postoperative pain relief, quality of life (Qo L), and alcohol and nicotine abuse was performed by clinical interview, letters and telephone interview in January 2016. Qo L of patients was evaluated with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) version 3.0. The patient were requested to fill in the questionnaires by themselves via correspondence or clinical interview .RESULTS A total of 80 patients were enrolled for analysis, including 44 who underwent the original Frey’s procedure and 36 who underwent a modified Frey’s procedure. The mean age was 46 years in the original group and 48 ye ars in the modified group. Thirtyfive male patients (80%) were in the original group and 33 (92%) in the modified group. There were no differences in the operating time, blood loss, and postoperative morbidity and mortality between the two groups The mean follow-up was 50.3 mo in the original group and 48.7 mo in the modified group. There were no differences in endocrine and exocrine function preservation between the two groups. The original Frey’s procedure resulted in significantly better pain relief, as shown by 5 -year follow-up (P = 0.032), better emotional status (P = 0.047) and fewer fatigue symptoms (P = 0.028). When stratifying these patients by the M-ANNHEIM severity index, no impact was found on pain relief after the two types of surgery. CONCLUSION The original Frey’s procedure is as safe as the modified procedure, but the former due better pain relief. The severity of CP does not affect postoperative pain relief.
其他文献
本文用生物测定法技术检测了30例进行性系统性硬化症(PSS)患者血清中白细胞介素2(IL-2)、白细胞介素4(IL-4)、白细胞介素6(IL-6)的水平。结果表明:在PSS患者血清中,IL-2、IL-4的检出率显著高于对照组,IL-6的检出率虽然高于对
AIM To determine whether infection in patients with acute severe alcoholic hepatitis(AAH) treated with corticosteroids is associated with increased mortality.ME
柳传志常说一句话:在大公司里学做人,在小公司里学做事。能在大公司做好人不一定能在小公司做好事。公司越大,分工越细,对人才的要求也越低。小公司需要多面手,但职业发展的信心和目标要靠自己建立。  作家巫昂最近为自己的工作室招聘时写了下面一段“招工秘笈”:  “做工作室跟开公司不同,没有人事部,没有人替你管人力资源,那些大词儿都是大公司才用得到的。所谓财务部就是你管好自己的转账密码和网银U盾;所谓事业发
AIM To identify risk factors associated with hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC), describe tumor characteristics and treatments pursed for a cohort of individuals wit
Pseudopolyps are a well described entity in the literature and even though the exact pathogenesis of their formation is not completely understood, they are cons
肺心病、冠心病、高血压病111例甲皱微循环观察江苏省省级机关医院卓铁军,周明秀关键词肺原性心脏病,冠状动脉硬化性心脏病,高血压病,甲皱微循环微循环研究用于多种疾病的诊断和治疗
目的 评价套扎器法内镜黏膜下切除术(ESMRL)治疗直肠类癌患者的远期疗效.方法 2002年4月至2006年4月复旦大学附属中山医院内镜中心收治的45例直径≤2 cm直肠类癌患者,均行ESMRL,其中男20例,女25例,年龄19~73岁,平均年龄(58±18)岁.分析本组患者切除根治性、术后并发症和远期疗效.结果 本组患者占同期内镜中心肠镜检查患者的1.8%(45/24600),病灶距离肛缘从2~
“人为什么一定要结婚?我不结婚不可以吗?”这样的问题我已经记不清楚被问了多少遍了,问这个问题的好像都是女人。  是啊,我们从小就知道男大当婚女大当嫁,可为什么要结婚呢?  有人说“为了合法地做爱”!婚姻法没有规定两个没有配偶的人发生性关系有什么过错。所以,“为了合法地做爱”好像也站不住脚!  为了传宗接代?但是现在一些国家选择丁克的夫妻很多……  为了经济?为了父母?为了跟别人一样?  还为了什么
There is currently a pressing need for alternative the-rapies to liver transplantation. The number of patients waiting for a liver transplant is substantially h
请下载后查看,本文暂不支持在线获取查看简介。 Please download to view, this article does not support online access to view profile.